Plain English Explanation
This question asks who is responsible for watching your systems for cyber attacks - your own team or an outside security company. It's like asking whether you have your own security guards or hire a professional security firm. Enterprise customers want to understand your security monitoring model to assess whether you have the right expertise and resources protecting their data.
Business Impact
Your monitoring approach directly impacts customer trust and compliance requirements. Internal monitoring shows control but requires significant investment in tools and expertise that many SMBs can't afford. Third-party monitoring through a reputable managed security service provider (MSSP) often provides better coverage at lower cost and demonstrates you're leveraging specialized expertise. Either approach can win deals, but you must clearly articulate your model's strengths and have proper vendor management if outsourced.
Common Pitfalls
Companies often try to claim internal monitoring when they only have basic alerting tools without dedicated security staff, which quickly falls apart under scrutiny. Another mistake is using an unvetted or budget third-party provider without proper SLAs, certifications, or incident response procedures, which can actually increase risk rather than reduce it.
Expert Guidance
Upgrade to SOFT_GATED tier to unlock expert guidance
Implementation Roadmap
Upgrade to DEEP_GATED tier to unlock implementation roadmap
Question Information
- Category
- Financial and Insurance
- Question ID
- FIDP-10
- Version
- 4.1.0
- Importance
- Standard
- Weight
- 5/10
Unlock Premium Content
Get expert guidance, business impact analysis, and implementation roadmaps for all questions.
Get Access